La Règle 2 minutes pour Thinking Fast and Slow
La Règle 2 minutes pour Thinking Fast and Slow
Blog Article
If that was all this book was, it’d just Supposé que another in a mass of books that have as their thesis “You’re wrong about that!” Which I appreciate knowing, délicat there’s a repère where it’s a little eye rolling parce que they libéralité’t offer any helpful suggestions nous-mêmes how not to Si wrong, or why these patterns of wrongness exist and endure.
A random event, by definition, does not lend itself to explanation, joli collection of random events ut behave in a highly regular Chic.
یکی از ویژگیهای خوب کتاب این است که در انتهای هر فصل در چند جملهی کوتاه، مثالهایی درباره موضوع بحث ذکر میشود که برای درک بهتر مطالب و مرور مجدد مفاهیم در آینده بسیار کمک میکند.
My native with this book, which is Nous-mêmes I've tossed aside after 60 pages, is not so much that it's poorly hommage or that it's hard to understand - in fact, the exact contraire is true.
Fin Nisbett repère out that no matter how many such examples we gather, we can never prove the proposition. The right thing to ut is to train expérience compartiment that would disprove it.
Cognitive Ease: We all love it when we cadeau’t have to work too hard parce que system 2 doesn’t like being bothered. So we admire and rather pas connaissance cognitive ease. Things that are less complex have a patente effect nous our behavior. Psychologists habitudes the term “Mind at ease puts a smile je the frimousse”.
: our tendency to reshape the past into coherent stories that shape our views of the world and expectations connaissance the future.
The evidence is persuasive: activities that impose high demands je System 2 require self-control, and the exertion of self-control is depleting and unpleasant. Unlike cognitive load, ego depletion is at least in bout a loss of but.
The phenomenon we were studying is so common and so mortel in the everyday world that you should know its name: it is année anchoring effect
Some subjects played the game, which takes embout three hours to intégral, while others watched a video about cognitive bias. All were tested nous-mêmes bias-mitigation skills kahneman before the training, immediately afterward, and then finally after eight to 12 weeks had passed.
Joli if you're like me and you prefer authors to cut to the chase, make their point, and then leave you with a whopping big appendix if you're interested in the regression analysis of how many freshmen would watch a guy choke to death because they think someone else will come to the rescue, then this book is not connaissance you.
Joli, as Kahneman found, this ut hold with actual people. Not only ut real humans act irrationally, plaisant real humans deviate from the expected predictions of the rational ferment model systematically. This means that we humans are (to borrow a lexème from another book in this vein) predictably irrational. Our folly is consistent.
Thinking, Fast and Slow is Nous-mêmes of the most in-depth Psychology books I've read. I fell in love with the subject after taking AP Psychology last year as a Puîné in high school, and am currently craving more books and Rubrique related to the field.
I suppose it’s also worth mentioning that this book reaffirms my supercilious disregard for economics. According to Kahneman, provision brokers and investors have no idea what they are doing—and some of them know this, joli most of them offrande’t. Economists are, connaissance the most portion, highly-trained, fin they seem bent upon sustaining this theoretical fantasy Position in which humans are rational creatures.